Any kind of discipline does not necessarily mean hierarchy, just as hierarchy does not always resemble discipline. What has humanity been doing for 5,000 years? It observed hierarchy. Then came discipline. In the Modern Era, labor discipline eventually morphed into the concentration camp and the GULAG. Following this phenomenon of extreme discipline, liberals pinned two systems—Fascism and Communism—to the pillory of shame. "People are not slaves! People are free individuals!" they proclaimed.

But what did we see next? The COVID-19 pandemic? Staged footage of the dead in black body bags? The fueling of panic and hysteria through the mass media? Voluntary lines for vaccinations administered by smiling medical volunteers? Lockdowns? When you weren't allowed to step onto the street, and couldn't enter a shop without a mask?

No, my friends. Liberals are not at all different from their predecessors. Yes, I assert that there was never any "Socialism" in Germany or Russia. Those were specific forms of Conservatism. It all depended on the specifics of the nation. All peoples of the world are carriers of a very important energetic depth that no one has yet measured. Well, here is the truth: all nations depend on reflection and possess "accumulators." Some accumulators produce conservative socialism in the form of Fascism; other charges produce conservative socialism in the form of 20th-century Russian Communism. But both of these charges are conservative because the hierarchy is clearly visible in both systems.

So, where is the hierarchy in Liberalism, you ask?
Have you not realized it yet?
Around you triumphs the **Conservative Liberalism of the Money Bags**. Ordinary people decide nothing. Parties, parliaments—these are all mere formalities. The dictatorship of money lacks only one thing so far: **digital camps.**